R v Knight [2023] NSWDC 658
Given the offender's violation of a trusted relationship and the objective seriousness of the sexual intercourse without consent, along with aggravating factors including post-offence conduct, and mitigating factors such as lack of prior record, PTSD, health issues, and hardship to others, a head sentence of three years with a non-parole period of 16 months was appropriate, with special circumstances adjusting the ratio.
- Parties
- Crown: NSW DPP; Offender: Trever Knight
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to term of imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Sexual Intercourse Without Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NSW DPP
Crown
Trever Knight
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Determination of sentence for sexual intercourse without consent under s 61I Crimes Act 1900
- 2 Assessment of objective seriousness and aggravating/mitigating factors
- 3 Consideration of victim impact and subjective factors of the offender
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's violation of a trusted relationship and the objective seriousness of the sexual intercourse without consent, along with aggravating factors including post-offence conduct, and mitigating factors such as lack of prior record, PTSD, health issues, and hardship to others, a head sentence of three years with a non-parole period of 16 months was appropriate, with special circumstances adjusting the ratio.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to term of imprisonment
Orders
- Head sentence of 3 years imprisonment from 23 August 2023 to 22 August 2026
- Non-parole period of 16 months ending 22 December 2024
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment