R v John Paul Bryant [2001] NSWCCA 81
Although the applicant had a poor criminal history and had breached the recognisance imposed when sentence was deferred, the two-year sentence with a one-year non-parole period for the assault occasioning actual bodily harm was unreasonably excessive having regard to the objective features of the offence on the agreed facts. A fixed term of six months' imprisonment was the appropriate substituted sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; sentence quashed; fixed term of six months' imprisonment substituted.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Excessive' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'plea of Guilty' 'recognisance Breach' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal against sentence should be granted.' "Whether the sentence of two years' imprisonment with a one-year non-parole period for assault occasioning actual bodily harm was unreasonably excessive." 'What sentence should be substituted if the appeal succeeded.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the applicant had a poor criminal history and had breached the recognisance imposed when sentence was deferred, the two-year sentence with a one-year non-parole period for the assault occasioning actual bodily harm was unreasonably excessive having regard to the objective features of the offence on the agreed facts. A fixed term of six months' imprisonment was the appropriate substituted sentence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; sentence quashed; fixed term of six months' imprisonment substituted.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'The sentence imposed on 6 November 2000 was quashed.' 'A sentence of a fixed term of imprisonment of six months was substituted, commencing on 29 August 2000 and expiring on 28 February 2001.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment