R v Harvey [2007] NSWSC 871
Because the offender was a young man suffering from a severe mental illness at the time of the offence, his culpability is significantly reduced. The offence is below the midrange of seriousness for murder and, after applying a discount for the guilty plea and recognising special circumstances, a non-parole period well below the standard is justified.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Jonathan Nathaniel Harvey
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- The offender is sentenced to imprisonment: non-parole period of 10 years and balance of term of 6 years, commencing 4 March 2006; eligible for parole on 3 March 2016.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence for Murder, Mental Illness in Sentencing, Standard Non Parole Period, Young Offenders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Jonathan Nathaniel Harvey
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for murder where offender is young and suffers from severe mental illness
- 2 Relevance of standard non-parole period in context of mental illness
- 3 Degree of criminal culpability when mental illness is a major factor
Ratio Decidendi
Because the offender was a young man suffering from a severe mental illness at the time of the offence, his culpability is significantly reduced. The offence is below the midrange of seriousness for murder and, after applying a discount for the guilty plea and recognising special circumstances, a non-parole period well below the standard is justified.
Court Disposition
The offender is sentenced to imprisonment: non-parole period of 10 years and balance of term of 6 years, commencing 4 March 2006; eligible for parole on 3 March 2016.
Orders
- The offender is sentenced to a term of imprisonment made up of a non-parole period of 10 years and a balance of term of 6 years.
- The sentence is to commence from 4 March 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment