R v Bohun [2019] NSWDC 807
Given the offender's multiple serious offences against several victims during a brief but violent episode while under existing court orders and the presence of subjective mitigation (drug addiction, remorse, limited rehabilitation prospects), a lengthy custodial sentence is required to reflect punishment, deterrence, denunciation, and protection of the community. Special circumstances warrant a reduction in the non-parole period, but general principles of totality and aggregate sentencing apply, resulting in an aggregate sentence of six years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years and six months.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of six years imprisonment. Non-parole period of three years and six months.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'violence Against Person' 'breach of Apprehended Violence Order' 'drug Related Offending' 'reckless Driving' 'weapon Offences' 'aggregate Sentencing' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for multiple serious offences including aggravated assault, breach of apprehended violence order, dangerous driving, and weapon possession committed by the offender?' 'How should the principles of totality, denunciation, rehabilitation, and the impact on victims be balanced in sentencing the offender?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's multiple serious offences against several victims during a brief but violent episode while under existing court orders and the presence of subjective mitigation (drug addiction, remorse, limited rehabilitation prospects), a lengthy custodial sentence is required to reflect punishment, deterrence, denunciation, and protection of the community. Special circumstances warrant a reduction in the non-parole period, but general principles of totality and aggregate sentencing apply, resulting in an aggregate sentence of six years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years and six months.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of six years imprisonment. Non-parole period of three years and six months.
Orders
- ['Aggregate sentence of six years imprisonment commencing 26 January 2019.' 'Non-parole period of three years and six months.' 'Eligible for parole on 25 July 2022, parole period of six months.' 'Sentence to expire on 25 January 2025.' 'Driving disqualification periods imposed: two years for dangerous drive and one...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment