R v Kho [2012] NSWDC 232
Mr Kho was sentenced on the basis that his role was less significant compared to his co-offenders, with consideration for his lack of prior convictions, hardship of serving a sentence as a foreign national, and principles of parity, resulting in a lower sentence than imposed for co-offenders and a non-parole period reflecting special circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence After Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'supply of Commercial Quantity of Heroin' 'parity in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence After Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Determination of objective seriousness for supply of commercial quantity of heroin' "Assessment of offender's role in the offence" 'Appropriate sentence considering parity with co-offenders' 'Consideration of personal circumstances in sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Kho was sentenced on the basis that his role was less significant compared to his co-offenders, with consideration for his lack of prior convictions, hardship of serving a sentence as a foreign national, and principles of parity, resulting in a lower sentence than imposed for co-offenders and a non-parole period reflecting special circumstances.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- ['Imprisonment commencing 16 January 2009' 'Non-parole period of seven years, expiring 15 January 2016' 'Head sentence of twelve years imprisonment' 'Order for destruction of drugs if not already destroyed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment