R v AK [2019] NSWDC 456
The Court found the objective seriousness of the offences to be in the mid-range, with Count 5 (sexual intercourse without consent) at or slightly above mid-range. The mental condition of the Offender slightly reduced moral culpability but did not lessen the need for deterrence or retribution. Having considered aggravating and mitigating factors, principles of totality, and limited weight to remorse, the Court determined an aggregate custodial sentence of ten years, with a seven-year non-parole period, was just and appropriate given the criminality involved.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conviction and aggregate sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'domestic Violence' 'sexual Offences' 'detention' 'influencing Witness' 'assault' 'contravention of Advo']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Determination of appropriate sentence for multiple domestic violence-related offences including detention, sexual intercourse without consent, influencing witness, common assault, contravention of ADVO, and stalking/intimidation; Consideration of mental illness and psychiatric conditions in sentencing; Assessment of objective seriousness and aggravating/mitigating factors; Application of principles of totality and accumulation in sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the objective seriousness of the offences to be in the mid-range, with Count 5 (sexual intercourse without consent) at or slightly above mid-range. The mental condition of the Offender slightly reduced moral culpability but did not lessen the need for deterrence or retribution. Having considered aggravating and mitigating factors, principles of totality, and limited weight to remorse, the Court determined an aggregate custodial sentence of ten years, with a seven-year non-parole period, was just and appropriate given the criminality involved.
Court Disposition
Conviction and aggregate sentence imposed
Orders
- ['Conviction of four offences set out on the Indictment: Count 2 (detaining wife for advantage in breach of s86(1)(b) Crimes Act), Count 3 (detaining stepdaughter for advantage in breach of s86(1)(b) Crimes Act), Count 4 (intent to influence witness in breach of s323A Crimes Act), Count 5 (sexual intercourse without...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment