Regina v Michael Kanaan [2006] NSWSC 539
The gravity of the offences, involving deliberate shooting at police officers with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and prevent apprehension, warrants significant custodial sentences, tempered slightly due to the delay in prosecution and the 'staleness' of the offences, but requiring partly concurrent terms due to two separate complainants.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction by Jury
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'firearms Offences' 'offences Against Police' 'malicious Discharge of Firearm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction by Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Sentencing for maliciously discharging a firearm with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and to prevent lawful apprehension' 'Appropriateness of concurrent vs. consecutive sentences for offences involving multiple complainants' 'Impact of delay in prosecution on sentencing']
Ratio Decidendi
The gravity of the offences, involving deliberate shooting at police officers with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and prevent apprehension, warrants significant custodial sentences, tempered slightly due to the delay in prosecution and the 'staleness' of the offences, but requiring partly concurrent terms due to two separate complainants.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentencing
Orders
- ['Count 5: 8 years imprisonment from 30 March 2006 to 29 March 2014; non-parole period of 5 years from 30 March 2006 to 29 March 2011.' 'Count 6: 7 years imprisonment from 30 March 2006 to 29 March 2013; non-parole period of 4 years from 30 March 2006 to 29 March 2010 (wholly concurrent with Count 5).' 'Count 2: 10...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment