Regina v Jasper [2004] NSWSC 155
The appropriate sentence is one greater than any previously imposed sentence for the same conduct, equal to that imposed on the co-offender for the identical offence, but made concurrent so as not to increase the overall length of imprisonment, thereby reflecting parity, totality, and avoiding double punishment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Prisoner sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment for supply of heroin, with a non-parole period of 3 years; sentence to be served concurrently with previous sentences and not increasing overall sentence length.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'supply of Heroin' 'double Jeopardy' 'parity' 'totality']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for supply of heroin where prisoner has previously been sentenced for related conduct' 'Application of totality and parity principles in sentencing' 'Whether imposing additional penalty constitutes double punishment for same criminal activity']
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate sentence is one greater than any previously imposed sentence for the same conduct, equal to that imposed on the co-offender for the identical offence, but made concurrent so as not to increase the overall length of imprisonment, thereby reflecting parity, totality, and avoiding double punishment.
Court Disposition
Prisoner sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment for supply of heroin, with a non-parole period of 3 years; sentence to be served concurrently with previous sentences and not increasing overall sentence length.
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for 5 years, commencing 27 February 2005, expiring 26 February 2010.' 'Fix a non-parole period of 3 years to expire on 26 February 2008.' 'Sentence to be concurrent with sentences imposed on 11 April 2003.' 'Eligibility for release on parole on 26 February 2008.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment