R v Roberts [2019] NSWDC 234
Given the nature and number of offences, breach of trust, objective seriousness assessed mostly near mid-range, prior relevant criminal history, limited remorse and only reasonable prospects for rehabilitation, a substantial aggregate sentence is warranted to reflect the purposes of sentencing relevant to child sexual offending.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Sentenced to an aggregate sentence of eight years imprisonment with a non-parole period of six years
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'historical Child Sexual Offences' 'aggregate Sentence' 'sexual Offences Against Children']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentencing for historical child sexual offences' 'Aggregate sentencing for multiple offences against multiple victims' 'Assessment of objective seriousness for indecent assault and sexual intercourse offences' 'Consideration of subjective factors for offender with prior convictions']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the nature and number of offences, breach of trust, objective seriousness assessed mostly near mid-range, prior relevant criminal history, limited remorse and only reasonable prospects for rehabilitation, a substantial aggregate sentence is warranted to reflect the purposes of sentencing relevant to child sexual offending.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to an aggregate sentence of eight years imprisonment with a non-parole period of six years
Orders
- ['Conviction recorded on all four counts' 'Aggregate sentence of eight years imprisonment commencing 16 April 2019 and expiring 15 April 2027' 'Non-parole period of six years expiring 15 April 2025' 'Statutory non-publication order concerning identity of complainants']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment