R v Torres [2016] NSWDC 318
A custodial sentence is appropriate for the offences. However, in light of the offender's early guilty plea, significant assistance to law enforcement, time already spent in custody, and favourable prospects for rehabilitation, a substantial discount is justified and the non-parole period should expire immediately so that the offender is released to parole.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- For each offence, the offender is sentenced to imprisonment. A non-parole period of 8 months and 18 days is set, expiring on the day of the sentence, with the offender to be released to parole. The head sentence in each matter is 2 years and 9 months. Special circumstances found in favour of the offender.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'manufacture of Prohibited Drug' 'absconding' 'discount for Guilty Plea and Assistance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What is the appropriate sentence for the offender's involvement in the manufacture of a prohibited drug given his plea, assistance, and background?" "Should time already served in custody and the offender's rehabilitation prospects justify immediate eligibility for parole?"]
Ratio Decidendi
A custodial sentence is appropriate for the offences. However, in light of the offender's early guilty plea, significant assistance to law enforcement, time already spent in custody, and favourable prospects for rehabilitation, a substantial discount is justified and the non-parole period should expire immediately so that the offender is released to parole.
Court Disposition
For each offence, the offender is sentenced to imprisonment. A non-parole period of 8 months and 18 days is set, expiring on the day of the sentence, with the offender to be released to parole. The head sentence in each matter is 2 years and 9 months. Special circumstances found in favour of the offender.
Orders
- ['The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for each offence.' 'A non-parole period of eight months and 18 days is set from 8 June 2015.' 'The non-parole period expires 26 February 2016.' 'The offender is to be released to parole on 26 February 2016.' 'A head sentence for each matter of two years and nine months is...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment