R v Su [2021] NSWDC 788
The aggregate sentence of two years' imprisonment is appropriate, reduced for the early guilty plea and served by way of Intensive Correction Order in the community, as the threshold for imprisonment is met but community safety and strong prospects of rehabilitation support an ICO over full-time custody.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Intensive Correction Order with fines
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'break and Enter' 'intimidation' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'firearms Offences' 'rehabilitation' 'prospects of Rehabilitation' 'imprisonment Threshold' 'intensive Correction Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the offender has good prospects of rehabilitation' 'Whether the statutory threshold for imprisonment under s 5 is crossed' 'Whether an Intensive Correction Order is appropriate for the aggregate sentence']
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence of two years' imprisonment is appropriate, reduced for the early guilty plea and served by way of Intensive Correction Order in the community, as the threshold for imprisonment is met but community safety and strong prospects of rehabilitation support an ICO over full-time custody.
Court Disposition
Intensive Correction Order with fines
Orders
- ['Imprisonment for two years commencing 13 October 2021, to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order (ICO) in the community, with conditions: not commit any offence; submit to supervision by Community Corrections Officer; participate in rehabilitation/treatment program; abstain from alcohol; report by...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment