R v Su [2021] NSWDC 788

R v Su [2021] NSWDC 788

The aggregate sentence of two years' imprisonment is appropriate, reduced for the early guilty plea and served by way of Intensive Correction Order in the community, as the threshold for imprisonment is met but community safety and strong prospects of rehabilitation support an ICO over full-time custody.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 October 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
Intensive Correction Order with fines
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'break and Enter' 'intimidation' 'assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm' 'firearms Offences' 'rehabilitation' 'prospects of Rehabilitation' 'imprisonment Threshold' 'intensive Correction Order']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the offender has good prospects of rehabilitation' 'Whether the statutory threshold for imprisonment under s 5 is crossed' 'Whether an Intensive Correction Order is appropriate for the aggregate sentence']

Ratio Decidendi

The aggregate sentence of two years' imprisonment is appropriate, reduced for the early guilty plea and served by way of Intensive Correction Order in the community, as the threshold for imprisonment is met but community safety and strong prospects of rehabilitation support an ICO over full-time custody.

Court Disposition

Intensive Correction Order with fines

Orders

  • ['Imprisonment for two years commencing 13 October 2021, to be served by way of Intensive Correction Order (ICO) in the community, with conditions: not commit any offence; submit to supervision by Community Corrections Officer; participate in rehabilitation/treatment program; abstain from alcohol; report by...