R v Tesoriero [2019] NSWDC 617
The offences were of mid-range objective seriousness for drugs and low-range for firearms, the only appropriate sentence was a full-time custodial sentence given the nature and extent of offending, special circumstances justified a reduction in the statutory non-parole period due to rehabilitation prospects, lack of prior full-time custody, and family support. Aggregate sentence appropriately reflects the total criminality without being crushing, with a significant non-parole period reduction to promote rehabilitation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Full-time custodial sentence imposed, aggregate sentence of eight years with non-parole period of four years and six months.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'firearms Offences' 'aggregate Sentencing' 'remorse' 'special Circumstances' 'mental Health in Sentencing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for multiple drug and firearms offences, having regard to objective and subjective seriousness, principles of totality, parity, and special circumstances?']
Ratio Decidendi
The offences were of mid-range objective seriousness for drugs and low-range for firearms, the only appropriate sentence was a full-time custodial sentence given the nature and extent of offending, special circumstances justified a reduction in the statutory non-parole period due to rehabilitation prospects, lack of prior full-time custody, and family support. Aggregate sentence appropriately reflects the total criminality without being crushing, with a significant non-parole period reduction to promote rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Full-time custodial sentence imposed, aggregate sentence of eight years with non-parole period of four years and six months.
Orders
- ['Offender convicted of six core offences: supply more than commercial quantity of prohibited drug (495g methylamphetamine, s25(2)), supply more than indictable quantity (5.13g, 13.98g, 80.08g, 223.8g methylamphetamine, s25(1)), supply prohibited firearm (s51(1A)(a)) and further eight lesser offences per s166...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment