R v Bigatton (No 5) [2024] NSWDC 285

R v Bigatton (No 5) [2024] NSWDC 285

The offender, while knowing the regulatory requirements, provided financial product advice without an Australian Financial Services licence in a manner that warrants conviction but, in view of significant mitigating factors—including remorse, good character, mental health, delay, and reduced risk of reoffending—a custodial sentence is not appropriate and a recognisance release order with a conviction is the just outcome, achieving an appropriate balance of general deterrence and consideration of the offender's circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty
Outcome
Convicted and released on recognisance release order, to be of good behaviour for 3 years.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'unlicensed Provision of Financial Advice' 'corporations Act Breaches' 'general and Specific Deterrence' 'rehabilitation']
['criminal Law' 'financial Services Law'] ['sentencing' 'unlicensed Provision of Financial Advice' 'corporations Act Breaches' 'general and Specific Deterrence' 'rehabilitation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing After Plea of Guilty

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for providing financial product advice without an Australian Financial Services licence under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)?' 'How should the presence of disclaimers affect sentencing for unlicensed financial advice?' 'What is the appropriate weight to be given to general and specific deterrence, rehabilitation, and the personal circumstances of the offender in sentencing under the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)?']

Ratio Decidendi

The offender, while knowing the regulatory requirements, provided financial product advice without an Australian Financial Services licence in a manner that warrants conviction but, in view of significant mitigating factors—including remorse, good character, mental health, delay, and reduced risk of reoffending—a custodial sentence is not appropriate and a recognisance release order with a conviction is the just outcome, achieving an appropriate balance of general deterrence and consideration of the offender's circumstances.

Court Disposition

Convicted and released on recognisance release order, to be of good behaviour for 3 years.

Orders

  • ['The Offender is convicted.' 'Order, pursuant to s 20(1)(a), the conditional release of the Offender upon the condition that he enter into a recognisance, self in the sum of $100 without security.' 'The condition of the recognisance is that he be of good behaviour for a period of 3 years commencing 12 July 2024 and...