R v Mathew John RIDGEWAY (No 2) [2012] NSWDC 54
The sentence previously imposed contained errors regarding the aggregate sentence and non-parole period, which are corrected to reflect the proper calculation due to segregation in custody and statutory requirements, resulting in a reduced non-parole period and adjusted eligibility for parole.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence Correction
- Outcome
- Corrected sentence imposed with reduced effective non-parole period.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'correction of Sentence' 'aggregate Sentence' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence Correction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Correction of sentence imposed for aggravated robbery and kidnapping' 'Determination of aggregate and non-parole periods' 'Consideration of segregation in custody']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence previously imposed contained errors regarding the aggregate sentence and non-parole period, which are corrected to reflect the proper calculation due to segregation in custody and statutory requirements, resulting in a reduced non-parole period and adjusted eligibility for parole.
Court Disposition
Corrected sentence imposed with reduced effective non-parole period.
Orders
- ['For aggravated robbery: 5 years 6 months imprisonment from 17 January 2011 to 16 July 2016; non-parole period of 4 years from 17 January 2011 to 16 January 2015.' 'For kidnapping: 6 years 6 months imprisonment from 17 January 2012 to 16 July 2018; non-parole period of 3 years 10 months from 17 January 2012 to 16...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment