R v Dharminder Singh [2019] NSWDC 184
Given the offender's low objective and subjective seriousness, absence of financial motivation or wider community dissemination, plea of guilty, good character, and substantial prospects of rehabilitation, the aggregate sentence of 2 years and 3 months imprisonment should be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order rather than full-time custody, with additional community service conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Decision
- Outcome
- Convicted; sentenced to aggregate imprisonment of 2 years and 3 months to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Supply Offences' 'intensive Correction Order' 'aggregate Sentence' 'objective Seriousness' 'mitigating Factors' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for the offender convicted of two counts of supplying a prohibited drug and one offence of unlawfully transporting alkaloid poppies?' 'Does the objective and subjective seriousness of the offences warrant a custodial sentence or a community-based order?' 'What is the proper application of mitigating and aggravating factors, and the totality principle, in the sentencing of the offender?']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's low objective and subjective seriousness, absence of financial motivation or wider community dissemination, plea of guilty, good character, and substantial prospects of rehabilitation, the aggregate sentence of 2 years and 3 months imprisonment should be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order rather than full-time custody, with additional community service conditions.
Court Disposition
Convicted; sentenced to aggregate imprisonment of 2 years and 3 months to be served by way of an Intensive Correction Order.
Orders
- ['Convicted for supply prohibited drug (opium) (s 25(1) DMTA).' 'Convicted for supply prohibited drug (Papaver Somniferum) (s 25(1) DMTA).' 'Aggregate sentence of 2 years and 3 months imprisonment.' 'Sentence to be served by Intensive Correction Order commencing 17 May 2019.' 'Report to Community Corrections office...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment