R v Jasper [2003] NSWSC 287
The offender engaged in a sustained course of corrupt acts as a police officer, including perverting the course of justice, accepting bribes, and facilitating criminal activity, for personal gain and contrary to police obligations. Sentence was determined based on the seriousness of the offending, the principle of parity with a co-offender (Patison), the offender's plea of guilty, his assistance to authorities, his personal circumstances, and the need for general deterrence and denunciation. A discount of approximately 30% was given for plea and cooperation. The cumulative sentences resulted in a total effective sentence of 7 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 5 years.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Prisoner sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'police Corruption' 'bribery' 'perverting the Course of Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentencing for acts of police corruption including perverting the course of justice, bribery, corrupt rewards, and associated offences' 'Consideration of parity in sentencing with co-offender' 'Effect of plea of guilty and assistance to authorities on sentencing' 'Relative culpability between accused and co-offender']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender engaged in a sustained course of corrupt acts as a police officer, including perverting the course of justice, accepting bribes, and facilitating criminal activity, for personal gain and contrary to police obligations. Sentence was determined based on the seriousness of the offending, the principle of parity with a co-offender (Patison), the offender's plea of guilty, his assistance to authorities, his personal circumstances, and the need for general deterrence and denunciation. A discount of approximately 30% was given for plea and cooperation. The cumulative sentences resulted in a total effective sentence of 7 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 5 years.
Court Disposition
Prisoner sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- ['In respect of the indictment dated 13 December 2002: Count 1 - 3 years fixed term; Count 2 - 4 years, non-parole period 3 years; Count 3 - 3 years fixed term; Counts 1, 2, 3 concurrent. Count 4 - 3 years fixed term; Count 7 - 3 years fixed term; Count 6 - 4 years, non-parole period 3 years; Counts 4, 6, 7...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment