Regina v Stanley John Sebbens [2007] NSWDC 217
The offender's mental health condition, demonstrated rehabilitation, community support, and early guilty plea warranted a mitigated sentence below the standard non-parole period; a 15-month sentence was appropriate, with a non-parole period of nine months, direction to suspend upon entering a good behaviour bond.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Offender: Stanley John Sebbens
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Offender convicted, sentenced to 15 months imprisonment (NPP 9 months, balance 6 months), sentence suspended on condition of entering into a good behaviour bond.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Aggravated Break Enter and Steal, Non Parole Period, Mental Health and Sentencing, Suspended Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Stanley John Sebbens
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriateness of imposing standard non-parole period for aggravated break, enter and steal
- 2 Effect of mental health and rehabilitation factors on sentencing
- 3 Suitability of suspended sentence given offender's circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's mental health condition, demonstrated rehabilitation, community support, and early guilty plea warranted a mitigated sentence below the standard non-parole period; a 15-month sentence was appropriate, with a non-parole period of nine months, direction to suspend upon entering a good behaviour bond.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted, sentenced to 15 months imprisonment (NPP 9 months, balance 6 months), sentence suspended on condition of entering into a good behaviour bond.
Orders
- Offender to be of good behaviour for bond duration.
- Offender must provide address to Registry.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment