R v APR [2007] NSWDC 249

R v APR [2007] NSWDC 249

The offender was sentenced to substantial fixed and aggregate terms of imprisonment for multiple counts of aggravated sexual assault and aggravated indecent assault on his daughter. The court found his voluntary confession was not solely a product of remorse, but also of mental illness. While the offender's mental illness and guilty plea were taken into account, they did not mitigate the seriousness of the offences or justify a further discount beyond that fixed by law. The offender's conduct was aggravated by abuse of trust and the lasting harm to the complainant.

Parties
Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: APR
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Offender sentenced to imprisonment; non-parole period of six years, head sentence of eight years.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Aggravated Indecent Assault, Delay in Prosecution, Mental Illness in Sentencing
Criminal Law Sentencing Aggravated Sexual Assault Aggravated Indecent Assault Delay in Prosecution Mental Illness in Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Prosecution

APR

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for aggravated sexual assault and aggravated indecent assault committed against a child by her father?
  2. 2 To what extent should the offender's mental illness, substance abuse, and voluntary confession affect the sentence?
  3. 3 Is an 'Ellis discount' for voluntary confession warranted, and if so, to what degree?

Ratio Decidendi

The offender was sentenced to substantial fixed and aggregate terms of imprisonment for multiple counts of aggravated sexual assault and aggravated indecent assault on his daughter. The court found his voluntary confession was not solely a product of remorse, but also of mental illness. While the offender's mental illness and guilty plea were taken into account, they did not mitigate the seriousness of the offences or justify a further discount beyond that fixed by law. The offender's conduct was aggravated by abuse of trust and the lasting harm to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Offender sentenced to imprisonment; non-parole period of six years, head sentence of eight years.

Orders

  • On count one, fixed term of imprisonment of three years (from 30 Oct 2007).
  • On count five, fixed term of imprisonment of three years (from 30 Oct 2007).