R v Robertson; R v Hopkinson [2021] NSWSC 861
Both offenders, having pleaded guilty to the murder of Justin Tsang, were sentenced on the basis of their respective roles, youth, immaturity, and psychological factors. The Court differentiated between the principal (Mr Erdogan) and subordinate roles, finding Robertson's involvement to be above mid-range seriousness due to the brutality of the killing and his role in the clean-up, mitigated by youth, immaturity, and duress. Hopkinson's role, as an accomplice to the specially aggravated kidnapping foundational to the constructive murder, was assessed at mid-range, likewise mitigated by youth, depression, immaturity, and negative peer influence. Both received discounts for early guilty...
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Offender: Joel Robertson; Offender: Christopher Hopkinson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence / Judgment Following Guilty Pleas
- Outcome
- Robertson: Sentenced to 13 years and 2 months imprisonment (non-parole period 9 years). Hopkinson: Sentenced to 12 years and 9 months imprisonment (non-parole period 8 years 3 months).
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Murder, Constructive Murder, Joint Criminal Enterprise, Aggravated Kidnapping
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Joel Robertson
Offender
Christopher Hopkinson
Offender
Procedural Posture
Sentence / Judgment Following Guilty Pleas
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for murder following guilty plea, considering youth, mental health, duress, and prospects of rehabilitation
- 2 Objective seriousness and culpability for murder—distinctions between principal and subordinate roles; application of standard non-parole period for juvenile victim
- 3 Effect of assistance to authorities and guilty plea on sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Both offenders, having pleaded guilty to the murder of Justin Tsang, were sentenced on the basis of their respective roles, youth, immaturity, and psychological factors. The Court differentiated between the principal (Mr Erdogan) and subordinate roles, finding Robertson's involvement to be above mid-range seriousness due to the brutality of the killing and his role in the clean-up, mitigated by youth, immaturity, and duress. Hopkinson's role, as an accomplice to the specially aggravated kidnapping foundational to the constructive murder, was assessed at mid-range, likewise mitigated by youth, depression, immaturity, and negative peer influence. Both received discounts for early guilty...
Court Disposition
Robertson: Sentenced to 13 years and 2 months imprisonment (non-parole period 9 years). Hopkinson: Sentenced to 12 years and 9 months imprisonment (non-parole period 8 years 3 months).
Orders
- Robertson sentenced to imprisonment for 13 years and 2 months, commencing 27 March 2019 and expiring 26 May 2032, non-parole period 9 years, parole eligibility 26 March 2028.
- Hopkinson sentenced to imprisonment for 12 years and 9 months, commencing 27 March 2019 and expiring 26 December 2031, non-parole period 8 years and 3 months, parole eligibility 26 June 2027.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment