R v Kerr [2019] NSWDC 680
Given the seriousness, repeated offending against a child in care, aggravating circumstances, and form 1 matters, but also considering early plea, remorse, subjective factors and standard non-parole period as a guide, an aggregate sentence of seven years and nine months with a non-parole period of five years is appropriate.
- Parties
- Offender: Mark Kerr; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence / Decision
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment for an aggregate period.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Indecent Assault of Child, Form 1 Offences, Aggregate Sentences, Standard Non Parole Period, Guilty Plea, Objective Seriousness, Victim Impact, Totality and Accumulation, Special Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Kerr
Offender
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Sentence / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate aggregate sentence for multiple indecent assault offences against a child
- 2 Application of standard non-parole period and statutory maximums under repealed s 61M(2) Crimes Act 1900
- 3 Significance of early guilty plea, past record, and Form 1 offences in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness, repeated offending against a child in care, aggravating circumstances, and form 1 matters, but also considering early plea, remorse, subjective factors and standard non-parole period as a guide, an aggregate sentence of seven years and nine months with a non-parole period of five years is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to imprisonment for an aggregate period.
Orders
- Aggregate sentence of seven years nine months.
- Non-parole period of five years. Offender eligible for parole on 1 August 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment