R v Conor Lavan [2018] NSWDC 263
The seriousness of the firearms offences, their connection to criminal activity, and the need for community protection necessitate a full-time custodial sentence. Aggregate sentence imposed reflecting totality and parity principles, with special circumstances found to allow extended supervision.
- Parties
- Offender: Conor Lavan; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Trial
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence imposed with non-parole period. Conviction after jury verdict. Firearm forfeiture order made.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Parity, Totality, Special Circumstances, Rehabilitation, Community Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conor Lavan
Offender
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Assessment of objective seriousness of firearm possession and supply
- 2 Application of parity between co-offenders
- 3 Consideration of totality principle in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the firearms offences, their connection to criminal activity, and the need for community protection necessitate a full-time custodial sentence. Aggregate sentence imposed reflecting totality and parity principles, with special circumstances found to allow extended supervision.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence imposed with non-parole period. Conviction after jury verdict. Firearm forfeiture order made.
Orders
- Aggregate sentence of three years and nine months with a non-parole period of two years and five months commencing 30 November 2016.
- Eligible for parole on 30 April 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment