R v John Sidney Denham [2019] NSWDC 212
An aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 13 years (non-parole period 7 years and 6 months) is appropriate having regard to the seriousness of the child sexual offences, the offender's antecedents, the aggravating features, and the need for both general and specific deterrence, as well as applying the principle of totality in light of the offender’s current sentences and the medical/age factors.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown); Offender: John Sidney Denham
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction
- Outcome
- Full-time custodial sentence imposed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Child Sexual Offences, Aggregate Sentencing, Historical Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Prosecutor
John Sidney Denham
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 How should historical child sexual offences be sentenced in light of current sentencing practices, the seriousness of the offending, and the principles of totality and proportionality?
- 2 What weight should be given to the offender’s age, health, prior convictions, and absence of remorse in determining sentence?
Ratio Decidendi
An aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 13 years (non-parole period 7 years and 6 months) is appropriate having regard to the seriousness of the child sexual offences, the offender's antecedents, the aggravating features, and the need for both general and specific deterrence, as well as applying the principle of totality in light of the offender’s current sentences and the medical/age factors.
Court Disposition
Full-time custodial sentence imposed.
Orders
- Offender convicted of four counts: three indecent assaults (s 81) and one buggery (s 79) against XX between 1981 and 1982.
- Aggregate sentence: 13 years imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment