R v Cook [2019] NSWDC 209
Given the offender's multiple break, enter and steal offences, his significant criminal history, commission of offences whilst on parole, early plea, and background of social disadvantage, an aggregate sentence of five years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years and four months is appropriate, commencing from 30 January 2019. Special circumstances are found due to institutionalisation and prospects of rehabilitation.
- Parties
- Crown: Director of Public Prosecutions; Offender: Michael Stephen Cook
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Break and Enter, Aggregate Sentencing, Form 1 Offences, Objective Seriousness, Social Disadvantage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Crown
Michael Stephen Cook
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for multiple break, enter and steal offences under s 112(1) of the Crimes Act 1900?
- 2 What relevance do the offender's social disadvantage and institutionalisation have to sentencing?
- 3 How should the principles of totality, special circumstances, and the use of aggregate sentencing be applied?
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's multiple break, enter and steal offences, his significant criminal history, commission of offences whilst on parole, early plea, and background of social disadvantage, an aggregate sentence of five years imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years and four months is appropriate, commencing from 30 January 2019. Special circumstances are found due to institutionalisation and prospects of rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Offender convicted of all offences to which he pleaded guilty.
- Aggregate sentence of five years imprisonment imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment