R v Ng (No 2) [2018] NSWDC 441
The appropriate sentence for the offender, convicted on the basis of accessorial liability and extended common purpose for wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, is imprisonment. The offender’s culpability is lower than his co-offender’s, with the offending found to be objectively at the low range of seriousness for this offence. Aggravating factors included use of violence and a weapon, planning, and commission while on bond; mitigating factors included low risk of re-offending, positive rehabilitation prospects, and evidence of remorse. On parity and proportionality, a head sentence of four years with a non-parole period of two years and nine months is appropriate.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Offender: Trevor Ng
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence / Post Trial; Sentencing Following Jury Verdict
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced to a term of full-time imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Intent to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm, Accessorial Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Trevor Ng
Offender
Procedural Posture
Sentence / Post Trial; Sentencing Following Jury Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for accessorial liability in wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm
- 2 Determination of objective seriousness of the offending
- 3 Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors for sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate sentence for the offender, convicted on the basis of accessorial liability and extended common purpose for wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, is imprisonment. The offender’s culpability is lower than his co-offender’s, with the offending found to be objectively at the low range of seriousness for this offence. Aggravating factors included use of violence and a weapon, planning, and commission while on bond; mitigating factors included low risk of re-offending, positive rehabilitation prospects, and evidence of remorse. On parity and proportionality, a head sentence of four years with a non-parole period of two years and nine months is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced to a term of full-time imprisonment
Orders
- Non-parole period of two years and nine months commencing 2 March 2018 and expiring 1 December 2020
- Head sentence of four years imprisonment expiring 1 March 2022
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment