R v BATEMAN [2000] NSWSC 867

R v BATEMAN [2000] NSWSC 867

Because the offender's psychotic depression substantially impaired his judgment and self-control, because but for that illness he would not have killed his wife, because he was genuinely remorseful, and because continued psychiatric oversight made the risk of reoffending negligible, the just and proper sentence was a five-year good behaviour bond with conditions requiring compliance with the approved treatment plan rather than imprisonment.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 August 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Plea of Guilty to Manslaughter Accepted in Full Discharge of Murder Indictment
Outcome
In lieu of imposing a sentence of imprisonment, the offender was directed to enter into a good behaviour bond for five years.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'manslaughter' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'psychotic Depression' 'good Behaviour Bond']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'manslaughter' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'psychotic Depression' 'good Behaviour Bond']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentencing for Manslaughter / Sentence After Plea of Guilty to Manslaughter Accepted in Full Discharge of Murder Indictment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["What sentence should be imposed for manslaughter where the offender's abnormality of mind substantially impaired his capacity to make a proper judgment and to control himself." 'Whether deterrence should carry significant weight where the offender acted but for serious mental illness, expressed genuine remorse, and was assessed as posing negligible risk if psychiatric care continued.' 'Whether a good behaviour bond with conditions requiring compliance with a psychiatric treatment plan was a just and proper disposition.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the offender's psychotic depression substantially impaired his judgment and self-control, because but for that illness he would not have killed his wife, because he was genuinely remorseful, and because continued psychiatric oversight made the risk of reoffending negligible, the just and proper sentence was a five-year good behaviour bond with conditions requiring compliance with the approved treatment plan rather than imprisonment.

Court Disposition

In lieu of imposing a sentence of imprisonment, the offender was directed to enter into a good behaviour bond for five years.

Orders

  • ['The offender must appear before the Court if called upon to do so at any time during the term of the bond.' 'The offender must be of good behaviour.' 'The offender must inform the Registrar of the Supreme Court of any change in residential address during the term of the bond.' 'The offender must continue to abide...