R v Plum [2007] NSWDC 365
Given the seriousness of the aggravated break and enter and robbery, the offender's prior record, but also his substantial rehabilitation and the imperative of parity with the co-offender, the court determined that a control order of two years with a non-parole period of 18 months in juvenile detention was the only appropriate sentence.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina (Crown); Offender: K Plum (Plum)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Control order imposed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Juvenile Offender, Aggravated Break and Enter, Robbery, Parity, Specific Deterrence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecution
K Plum (Plum)
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriateness of a control order versus adult sentencing for a juvenile offender convicted of aggravated break and enter and robbery
- 2 Application of the parity principle with respect to a co-offender already sentenced
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness of the aggravated break and enter and robbery, the offender's prior record, but also his substantial rehabilitation and the imperative of parity with the co-offender, the court determined that a control order of two years with a non-parole period of 18 months in juvenile detention was the only appropriate sentence.
Court Disposition
Control order imposed
Orders
- Offender committed for two years to the control of the Minister administering the Children (Detention Centres) Act 1987, term to run from 23 November 2007 to 22 November 2009.
- Non-parole period of eighteen months set to expire 22 May 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment