R v Nguyen [2023] NSWDC 288
The appropriate disposition for Joey Nguyen, having pleaded guilty to multiple serious drug offences and being a trusted middleman with high moral culpability but with mitigating features including trauma and positive prospects of some rehabilitation, is an aggregate sentence of 11 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 7 years and 6 months, finding special circumstances and backdating to reflect time in custody.
- Parties
- Crown: NSW DPP; Offender: Joey Nguyen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed; orders made under s.53A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999; finding of special circumstances.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Aggregate Sentence, Supply Large Commercial Quantity, Moral Culpability, Objective Seriousness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NSW DPP
Crown
Joey Nguyen
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for multiple drug offences including supply large commercial quantity of heroin and manufacture of prohibited drugs
- 2 Assessment of offender's role and moral culpability
- 3 Effect of personal circumstances, remorse, and rehabilitation prospects on sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate disposition for Joey Nguyen, having pleaded guilty to multiple serious drug offences and being a trusted middleman with high moral culpability but with mitigating features including trauma and positive prospects of some rehabilitation, is an aggregate sentence of 11 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 7 years and 6 months, finding special circumstances and backdating to reflect time in custody.
Court Disposition
Aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed; orders made under s.53A Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999; finding of special circumstances.
Orders
- Individual indicative sentences: Sequence 1 – 10 years (non-parole: 6 years 6 months); Sequence 3 – 9 years (non-parole: 5 years 10 months); Sequence 18 – 7 years (non-parole: 4 years 6 months); Sequence 19 – 4 years 6 months.
- Aggregate sentence of 11 years 6 months imprisonment from 15 October 2022 to 14 April 2034.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment