The Queen v Dalwood [2020] NSWDC 841
The Court imposed a full-time custodial sentence in light of the objective seriousness of the six offences involving persistent, planned, and exploitative child sexual offending and child pornography (including offences against children outside Australia), with general deterrence as the paramount purpose and guarded prospects for rehabilitation. The guilty plea attracted a 25% discount, but remorse was not established. The aggregate sentence was adjusted for totality, concurrency, and accumulation, resulting in a six-year head sentence and three-year non-parole period. Special circumstances were found.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina (ODPP); Offender: Daniel Dalwood
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Child Sexual Offences, Child Pornography, Offences Outside Australia
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (ODPP)
Prosecutor
Daniel Dalwood
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for six charges involving possession, solicitation, transmission, and procurement of child abuse and pornography material, including offences against children outside Australia?
- 2 How are the objective seriousness and mitigating/aggravating factors relevant to sentencing for these offences?
- 3 What impact does a psychiatric diagnosis (Paedophilic Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder) have on sentencing?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court imposed a full-time custodial sentence in light of the objective seriousness of the six offences involving persistent, planned, and exploitative child sexual offending and child pornography (including offences against children outside Australia), with general deterrence as the paramount purpose and guarded prospects for rehabilitation. The guilty plea attracted a 25% discount, but remorse was not established. The aggregate sentence was adjusted for totality, concurrency, and accumulation, resulting in a six-year head sentence and three-year non-parole period. Special circumstances were found.
Court Disposition
aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed
Orders
- Convictions entered for all six counts as per the indictment.
- Aggregate sentence: head sentence of 6 years' imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 years commencing 28 May 2019.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment