The Queen v Dalwood [2020] NSWDC 841

The Queen v Dalwood [2020] NSWDC 841

The Court imposed a full-time custodial sentence in light of the objective seriousness of the six offences involving persistent, planned, and exploitative child sexual offending and child pornography (including offences against children outside Australia), with general deterrence as the paramount purpose and guarded prospects for rehabilitation. The guilty plea attracted a 25% discount, but remorse was not established. The aggregate sentence was adjusted for totality, concurrency, and accumulation, resulting in a six-year head sentence and three-year non-parole period. Special circumstances were found.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina (ODPP); Offender: Daniel Dalwood
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Child Sexual Offences, Child Pornography, Offences Outside Australia

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina (ODPP)

Prosecutor

Daniel Dalwood

Offender

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for six charges involving possession, solicitation, transmission, and procurement of child abuse and pornography material, including offences against children outside Australia?
  2. 2 How are the objective seriousness and mitigating/aggravating factors relevant to sentencing for these offences?
  3. 3 What impact does a psychiatric diagnosis (Paedophilic Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder) have on sentencing?

Ratio Decidendi

The Court imposed a full-time custodial sentence in light of the objective seriousness of the six offences involving persistent, planned, and exploitative child sexual offending and child pornography (including offences against children outside Australia), with general deterrence as the paramount purpose and guarded prospects for rehabilitation. The guilty plea attracted a 25% discount, but remorse was not established. The aggregate sentence was adjusted for totality, concurrency, and accumulation, resulting in a six-year head sentence and three-year non-parole period. Special circumstances were found.

Court Disposition

aggregate sentence of imprisonment imposed

Orders

  • Convictions entered for all six counts as per the indictment.
  • Aggregate sentence: head sentence of 6 years' imprisonment, non-parole period of 3 years commencing 28 May 2019.