R v Baxter [2017] NSWDC 320
Given the seriousness of the offending—which involved substantial drug supply and firearms offences committed while on parole—and despite factors warranting some leniency, an aggregate sentence comprising a non-parole period of six years and a head sentence of nine and a half years was appropriate, with a modest finding of special circumstances to encourage rehabilitation and reduce the risk of reoffending.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Offender: Jamie Baxter
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Firearms Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Jamie Baxter
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for indictable quantity supply of methylamphetamine and firearms offences
- 2 Consideration of offender's circumstances and prospects for rehabilitation
- 3 Application of sentencing principles including special circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness of the offending—which involved substantial drug supply and firearms offences committed while on parole—and despite factors warranting some leniency, an aggregate sentence comprising a non-parole period of six years and a head sentence of nine and a half years was appropriate, with a modest finding of special circumstances to encourage rehabilitation and reduce the risk of reoffending.
Court Disposition
Convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment with a non-parole period of 6 years, commencing 9 August 2016, and a head sentence of 9½ years. Non-parole period expires 8 August 2022, at which time eligible for parole.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment