R v Griffiths [2024] NSWDC 605
Given the offender's manner of driving fell at the lower end of moral culpability, his strong prospects of rehabilitation, genuine remorse, significant psychiatric issues, and the absence of aggravating features, the appropriate sentence is two years imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive correction order with conditions, rather than full-time custody, to better promote community safety and rehabilitation.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Offender: Samuel Griffiths
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to two years imprisonment, to be served by way of an intensive correction order with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death, Intensive Correction Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Samuel Griffiths
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for offence of dangerous driving occasioning death under s 52A(1)(c) Crimes Act 1900
- 2 Assessment of moral culpability and objective seriousness
- 3 Application of intensive correction order pursuant to s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
Ratio Decidendi
Given the offender's manner of driving fell at the lower end of moral culpability, his strong prospects of rehabilitation, genuine remorse, significant psychiatric issues, and the absence of aggravating features, the appropriate sentence is two years imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive correction order with conditions, rather than full-time custody, to better promote community safety and rehabilitation.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to two years imprisonment, to be served by way of an intensive correction order with conditions.
Orders
- The offender is convicted.
- The offender is sentenced to a term of two years imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment