R (Cth) v Ratucadre [2024] NSWDC 649
The aggregate objective seriousness of the offending, including offences of domestic violence, threats to kill, contravention of court orders, and driving while disqualified, required a substantial term of full-time imprisonment. The sentence was mitigated somewhat by early guilty pleas and evidence of childhood disadvantage and substance abuse but was not sufficient to warrant a finding of special circumstances or alternatives to imprisonment. A lengthy non-parole period and an extended apprehended violence order were justified to protect the victim and the community.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex (Crown); Offender: Seta Ratucadre
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years 6 months; offender disqualified from driving for 12 months after parole eligibility; final apprehended violence order made for 10 years from completion of non-parole period; charge of stalk/intimidate dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Domestic Violence, Carriage Service Offence, Wounding With Intent, Contravene Apprehended Violence Order, Driving During Disqualification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex (Crown)
Prosecutor
Seta Ratucadre
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for aggregate offending involving use of carriage service to threaten to kill, wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm, contravention of apprehended domestic violence order, and driving during disqualification
- 2 Consideration of subjective factors for sentence
- 3 Application of guilty plea discounts
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate objective seriousness of the offending, including offences of domestic violence, threats to kill, contravention of court orders, and driving while disqualified, required a substantial term of full-time imprisonment. The sentence was mitigated somewhat by early guilty pleas and evidence of childhood disadvantage and substance abuse but was not sufficient to warrant a finding of special circumstances or alternatives to imprisonment. A lengthy non-parole period and an extended apprehended violence order were justified to protect the victim and the community.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years 6 months; offender disqualified from driving for 12 months after parole eligibility; final apprehended violence order made for 10 years from completion of non-parole period; charge of stalk/intimidate dismissed.
Orders
- Aggregate term of imprisonment of 6 years for the second, third, and fourth offences.
- Non-parole period fixed at 4 years 6 months, commencing 16 January 2023, expiring 15 July 2027.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment