R v Hawkins; R v Garland [2023] NSWSC 1201
The Court found that the risk of prejudice to Jason Hawkins from evidence admissible only against Stephen Garland was real and substantial, such that judicial directions would not suffice to eliminate the prejudice, and therefore a separate trial was necessary in the interests of justice under ss 21 and 29 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Application for Separate Trial Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Application granted; joint trial to be severed. Jason Hawkins and Stephen Garland to be tried separately.
- Legal Topics
- ['separate Trial' 'severance' 'murder' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'cut Throat Defence' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'prejudice' 'judicial Directions' 'accessory After the Fact']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Application for Separate Trial Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Jason Hawkins should be tried separately from Stephen Garland due to prejudicial evidence' 'Whether judicial directions could ameliorate the prejudice of inadmissible evidence in a joint trial' 'Application of the principles regarding joint trials for co-accused with cut-throat defences']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the risk of prejudice to Jason Hawkins from evidence admissible only against Stephen Garland was real and substantial, such that judicial directions would not suffice to eliminate the prejudice, and therefore a separate trial was necessary in the interests of justice under ss 21 and 29 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Application granted; joint trial to be severed. Jason Hawkins and Stephen Garland to be tried separately.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to ss 21 and 29 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), Jason Hawkins to be tried separately from Stephen Garland.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment