Vincent v State Bank of New South Wales Ltd [1995] FCA 777
Leave to appeal was refused because it was premature and inappropriate to determine the validity of service at the interlocutory stage; any petition hearing would allow the debtor to challenge service and the creditor to prove service, and no discrete legal point was isolated that would probably determine the service issue.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Orders Concerning Service of a Bankruptcy Notice
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['service of Bankruptcy Notice' 'substituted Service' "review of Registrar's Orders" 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Orders Concerning Service of a Bankruptcy Notice
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to appeal from Foster J.'s interlocutory orders varying the manner of service of a bankruptcy notice." "Whether questions about the validity or effectiveness of service should be determined at the interlocutory leave stage or at the hearing of any creditor's petition."]
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because it was premature and inappropriate to determine the validity of service at the interlocutory stage; any petition hearing would allow the debtor to challenge service and the creditor to prove service, and no discrete legal point was isolated that would probably determine the service issue.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is refused, with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment