Re Kassab, A. v. Ex parte Deputy Commissioner of Taxation for the Commonwealth of Australia [1994] FCA 973
Proof of service in accordance with s 214(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 does not amount to evidence upon which the court may be satisfied of service of the creditor's petition under s 52(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. Service must be effected as prescribed by the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and Bankruptcy Rules unless Parliament clearly states otherwise.
- Parties
- Judgment Debtor: Abdullah Kassab; Petitioning Creditor: Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case Stated (bankruptcy) / Full Court Consideration of Special Case
- Outcome
- Special case answered 'No'. Petition referred to single judge.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Creditor's Petition, Statutory Interpretation, Substituted Service, Conflict Between Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdullah Kassab
Judgment Debtor
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia
Petitioning Creditor
Procedural Posture
Special Case Stated (bankruptcy) / Full Court Consideration of Special Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service of a creditor's petition in bankruptcy by the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation can be effected by post under s 214(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, rather than strictly in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and Bankruptcy Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
Proof of service in accordance with s 214(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 does not amount to evidence upon which the court may be satisfied of service of the creditor's petition under s 52(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. Service must be effected as prescribed by the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and Bankruptcy Rules unless Parliament clearly states otherwise.
Court Disposition
Special case answered 'No'. Petition referred to single judge.
Orders
- The question stated in the special case be answered 'No'.
- The petition be referred to a single judge of the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment