Sweeney v Howard [2007] NSWSC 262
The Court lacks authority to order substituted service of a subpoena on a witness residing overseas unless leave is expressly granted or service is subsequently confirmed, and as a matter of discretion, will not issue such process without real means of enforcement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Application to Set Aside Substituted Service of Subpoena on an Overseas Witness
- Outcome
- Order setting aside substituted service of subpoena on overseas witness.
- Legal Topics
- ['service Outside Jurisdiction' 'subpoena' 'substituted Service' 'discretion in Procedural Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application to Set Aside Substituted Service of Subpoena on an Overseas Witness
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether substituted service of a subpoena on an Australian citizen residing overseas is permitted under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Pt 11, r 5' 'Whether the court should exercise its discretion to allow substituted service of a subpoena on a witness in a foreign country']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court lacks authority to order substituted service of a subpoena on a witness residing overseas unless leave is expressly granted or service is subsequently confirmed, and as a matter of discretion, will not issue such process without real means of enforcement.
Court Disposition
Order setting aside substituted service of subpoena on overseas witness.
Orders
- ['Orders sought in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the notice of motion granted.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment