In the matter of Mustang Marine Australia Services Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [2013] NSWSC 360
Service outside of Australia on the first defendant was authorised under UCPR Schedule 6, sub-paragraphs (a) and (i), as the cause of action arose in New South Wales, and the first defendant was properly joined to a defendant served in New South Wales; application for further particulars by the sixth defendant was refused as an abuse of process.
- Parties
- Plaintiff Liquidator: Mitchell Ball in his capacity as official liquidator of Mustang Marine Australia Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation) ACN 129 124 223; First Defendant: Standard Bank Asia Limited; Second Defendant: Mr R Watkins; Third Defendant: Mr MS Lodge; Fourth Defendant: Mr PH Armstrong; Fifth Defendant: Mr C Heaton; Sixth Defendant: Standard Bank PLC
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Decision on Application to Set Aside Service and for Further Particulars
- Outcome
- Application to set aside service or set aside the order granting leave to proceed is refused; applications for further particulars dismissed; costs ordered against applicants.
- Legal Topics
- Service Outside Jurisdiction, Joinder of Parties, Insolvent Trading, Particulars of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mitchell Ball in his capacity as official liquidator of Mustang Marine Australia Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation) ACN 129 124 223
Plaintiff Liquidator
Standard Bank Asia Limited
First Defendant
Mr R Watkins
Second Defendant
Mr MS Lodge
Third Defendant
Mr PH Armstrong
Fourth Defendant
Mr C Heaton
Fifth Defendant
Standard Bank PLC
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Decision on Application to Set Aside Service and for Further Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service outside jurisdiction on the first defendant was authorised under UCPR Schedule 6
- 2 Whether the proceedings are founded on a cause of action arising in New South Wales
- 3 Whether the claim arises out of damage suffered in New South Wales caused by a tortious act or omission
Ratio Decidendi
Service outside of Australia on the first defendant was authorised under UCPR Schedule 6, sub-paragraphs (a) and (i), as the cause of action arose in New South Wales, and the first defendant was properly joined to a defendant served in New South Wales; application for further particulars by the sixth defendant was refused as an abuse of process.
Court Disposition
Application to set aside service or set aside the order granting leave to proceed is refused; applications for further particulars dismissed; costs ordered against applicants.
Orders
- The first defendant's interlocutory process filed on 1 February 2013 is dismissed with costs.
- The sixth defendant's interlocutory process filed 29 January 2013 as amended is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment