Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Kingston Bake Pty Ltd ACN 074 482 134 [2016] NSWSC 131
The power in UCPR r 36.16 to set aside orders made in the absence of a party applies even to orders dismissing proceedings under UCPR r 12.8(7), as procedural fairness and natural justice require affected parties be allowed to approach the Court to explain and seek rescission if appropriate. There was no prejudice to defendants, and the overriding purpose of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 supported vacation of the orders.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Commonwealth Bank of Australia; First Defendant/first Respondent: Kingston Bake Pty Ltd ACN 074 482 134; Second Defendant/second Respondent: Edward John Piper; Third Defendant/third Respondent: Joanne Maree Piper
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Possession / Application to Set Aside Dismissal Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made 7 September 2015 dismissing the proceedings set aside; proceedings restored; each party to bear own costs of the motion.
- Legal Topics
- Set Aside Judgment, Procedural Fairness, Dismissal of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Plaintiff/applicant
Kingston Bake Pty Ltd ACN 074 482 134
First Defendant/first Respondent
Edward John Piper
Second Defendant/second Respondent
Joanne Maree Piper
Third Defendant/third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Possession / Application to Set Aside Dismissal Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders dismissing the proceedings under UCPR r 12.8(7) should be set aside under UCPR r 36.16
- 2 Whether UCPR r 12.8(7) excludes the operation of UCPR r 36.16 in setting aside orders made in absence of a party
Ratio Decidendi
The power in UCPR r 36.16 to set aside orders made in the absence of a party applies even to orders dismissing proceedings under UCPR r 12.8(7), as procedural fairness and natural justice require affected parties be allowed to approach the Court to explain and seek rescission if appropriate. There was no prejudice to defendants, and the overriding purpose of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 supported vacation of the orders.
Court Disposition
Orders made 7 September 2015 dismissing the proceedings set aside; proceedings restored; each party to bear own costs of the motion.
Orders
- Orders issued on 7 September 2015 dismissing the proceedings are hereby set aside.
- The proceedings are listed for further directions before the first Registrar's list on Monday 15 February 2016. Each party will bear their own costs of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment