Priority Lending Australia Pty Ltd v Martinsville Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 850
Default judgments for possession and for the liquidated sum should be set aside because there exist reasonably arguable defences raising triable issues as to the construction and enforceability of the loan agreements, penalty provisions, and unconscionability, with delay in filing explained, and no established prejudice to the plaintiffs.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Priority Lending Australia Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Alan Lee Walker t/as Alan Lee Walker and Andre Leon Lakomy (as receivers of Martinsville Pty Ltd); First Defendant: Martinsville Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Anthony James Murray; Third Defendant: Jamey Melissa Murray; Fourth Defendant: National Australia Bank Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment / Decision on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Default judgments for possession and liquidated sum set aside. Leave granted to file defence. Costs ordered against defendants. Matter stood over for further directions.
- Legal Topics
- Setting Aside Default Judgments, Loan Agreements, Unconscionable Conduct, Penalty Clauses, Construction of Contracts, Delay in Filing Defence, Interest Rate Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Priority Lending Australia Pty Ltd
First Plaintiff
Alan Lee Walker t/as Alan Lee Walker and Andre Leon Lakomy (as receivers of Martinsville Pty Ltd)
Second Plaintiff
Martinsville Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Anthony James Murray
Second Defendant
Jamey Melissa Murray
Third Defendant
National Australia Bank Limited
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment / Decision on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there existed a defence on the merits or triable issue to set aside default judgments
- 2 Whether interest clause is void for uncertainty
- 3 Whether interest rate provision qualifies as penalty
Ratio Decidendi
Default judgments for possession and for the liquidated sum should be set aside because there exist reasonably arguable defences raising triable issues as to the construction and enforceability of the loan agreements, penalty provisions, and unconscionability, with delay in filing explained, and no established prejudice to the plaintiffs.
Court Disposition
Default judgments for possession and liquidated sum set aside. Leave granted to file defence. Costs ordered against defendants. Matter stood over for further directions.
Orders
- Set aside default judgment entered on 7 September 2020 in the sum of $1,011,200.42.
- Set aside default judgment for possession entered on 1 October 2020 in respect of the property known as [REDACTED], Martinsville NSW 2265.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment