Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 546
No sufficient basis exists to set aside the order for cross-vesting; any alleged non-disclosure regarding legal representation was either not established or not material, and there was no relevant misapprehension of facts in the making of the transfer order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Set Aside or Recall Order for Cross Vesting
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['setting Aside Orders' 'non Disclosure' 'cross Vesting of Jurisdiction' 'misapprehension of Facts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Notice of Motion to Set Aside or Recall Order for Cross Vesting
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the order for transfer of proceedings to the Supreme Court of Western Australia should be set aside for non-disclosure or misapprehension of facts' 'Whether jurisdiction to set aside exists after transfer under the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act']
Ratio Decidendi
No sufficient basis exists to set aside the order for cross-vesting; any alleged non-disclosure regarding legal representation was either not established or not material, and there was no relevant misapprehension of facts in the making of the transfer order.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed with costs
Orders
- ["The plaintiff's Notice of Motion of 6 May 2013 is dismissed with costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment