NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Corry [2019] NSWSC 1659

NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Corry [2019] NSWSC 1659

The stay application was refused because Mr Ghaly's reliance on the settlement release raised contestable issues of construction, law, public policy and potentially fact, including whether cl 15 was apt to cover contempt proceedings, whether any such release would be enforceable, and whether s 61 applied. Those issues could not or should not be determined summarily on the present interlocutory application in the face of the plaintiffs' opposition.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Contempt Proceedings / Application by the Fifth Defendant to Stay Contempt Proceedings Against Him
Outcome
The fifth defendant's Notice of Motion seeking a stay was dismissed, with costs payable to the plaintiffs.
Legal Topics
['settlement Agreement and Release' 'stay of Proceedings' 'breach of Consent Orders' 'supreme Court Act (1970) NSW, S 61' 'public Policy and Contempt Proceedings']
['practice and Procedure' 'contempt' 'equity'] ['settlement Agreement and Release' 'stay of Proceedings' 'breach of Consent Orders' 'supreme Court Act (1970) Nsw, S 61' 'public Policy and Contempt Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application in Contempt Proceedings / Application by the Fifth Defendant to Stay Contempt Proceedings Against Him

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a release in a settlement agreement concerning the 2019 proceedings barred the plaintiffs from prosecuting contempt proceedings against Mr Ghaly for alleged breach of April 2018 orders.' 'Whether bringing the contempt proceedings was a breach of the settlement agreement and could be restrained or stayed.' 'Whether Supreme Court Act (1970) NSW, s 61 provided an appropriate basis for the stay application.' 'Whether the issues raised by Mr Ghaly could or should be determined summarily on the interlocutory application.']

Ratio Decidendi

The stay application was refused because Mr Ghaly's reliance on the settlement release raised contestable issues of construction, law, public policy and potentially fact, including whether cl 15 was apt to cover contempt proceedings, whether any such release would be enforceable, and whether s 61 applied. Those issues could not or should not be determined summarily on the present interlocutory application in the face of the plaintiffs' opposition.

Court Disposition

The fifth defendant's Notice of Motion seeking a stay was dismissed, with costs payable to the plaintiffs.

Orders

  • ["Order that the fifth defendant's Notice of Motion filed on 30 August 2019 as amended be dismissed." "Order that the fifth defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the Notice of Motion." 'Vacate the listing before the Registrar on 10 December 2019.']