Krisman v Central Coast Local Health District [2017] NSWSC 699

Krisman v Central Coast Local Health District [2017] NSWSC 699

The settlement was approved because, having regard to the evidence, the risk that Amy's case might not succeed, the burden of a trial, the benefits flowing to Amy from the settlement proceeds and the early stage at which settlement was reached, the Court was satisfied that the settlement was beneficial to Amy, a person under legal incapacity.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Settlement Approval in Negligence and Compensation to Relatives Act Proceedings / Application for Approval of Settlement Under S 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw)
Outcome
Settlement approved.
Legal Topics
['settlement Approval' 'person Under Legal Incapacity' 'protective Jurisdiction' 'medical Misdiagnosis' 'nervous Shock Injury']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Settlement Approval in Negligence and Compensation to Relatives Act Proceedings / Application for Approval of Settlement Under S 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw)

  1. 1 ["Whether the Court should approve the settlement of Amy McCartin's claim under s 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)." 'Whether the settlement was beneficial to the interests of Amy McCartin, a person under legal incapacity.']

Ratio Decidendi

The settlement was approved because, having regard to the evidence, the risk that Amy's case might not succeed, the burden of a trial, the benefits flowing to Amy from the settlement proceeds and the early stage at which settlement was reached, the Court was satisfied that the settlement was beneficial to Amy, a person under legal incapacity.

Court Disposition

Settlement approved.

Orders

  • ['Settlement approved.']