Reilly v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 6) [2024] FCA 965
The Court approved the payment of increased legal and administration costs from the settlement fund as they were reasonably and properly incurred, and varied previous orders accordingly. The Court made limited confidentiality orders only in respect of the Deloitte proposal document, finding insufficient reason for further suppression in the public interest of open justice.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Tracey Reilly; Second Applicant: Catherine Galli; First Respondent: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ACN 005 357 522; Second Respondent: Zurich Australia Limited ABN 92 000 010 195; Third Respondent: OnePath General Insurance Pty Limited ACN 072 892 365; Fourth Respondent: QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited ACN 003 191 035
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Representative Proceeding / Application for Approval of Costs of Administering Settlement and Distribution to Group Members
- Outcome
- Orders made varying cost distributions; limited confidentiality order granted
- Legal Topics
- Settlement Approval, Costs Assessment, Settlement Distribution, Open Justice, Confidentiality Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tracey Reilly
First Applicant
Catherine Galli
Second Applicant
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited ACN 005 357 522
First Respondent
Zurich Australia Limited ABN 92 000 010 195
Second Respondent
OnePath General Insurance Pty Limited ACN 072 892 365
Third Respondent
QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited ACN 003 191 035
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representative Proceeding / Application for Approval of Costs of Administering Settlement and Distribution to Group Members
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to approve additional legal and administration costs from the settlement fund
- 2 Whether to vary previous orders regarding legal cost distribution
- 3 Whether confidentiality orders should be imposed over specified documents
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the payment of increased legal and administration costs from the settlement fund as they were reasonably and properly incurred, and varied previous orders accordingly. The Court made limited confidentiality orders only in respect of the Deloitte proposal document, finding insufficient reason for further suppression in the public interest of open justice.
Court Disposition
Orders made varying cost distributions; limited confidentiality order granted
Orders
- Order 7(a) of the orders of 23 June 2023 is amended to approve $7,824,349.01 for the applicants' legal costs and disbursements to 16 June 2023.
- An additional $406,002.75 from the settlement is approved for applicants' legal costs and disbursements from 17 June 2023 relating to administration of the Settlement Distribution Scheme.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment