R v TAB [2002] NSWCCA 274

R v TAB [2002] NSWCCA 274

The appeal against conviction was dismissed because the trial judge correctly admitted and directed the jury on relationship and complaint evidence, any misstatements in directions were appropriately corrected, there was no miscarriage of justice regarding character evidence because evidence sought was not available and no miscarriage arose from its exclusion, and there was no substantive error in admitting or directing on other evidence. Leave to appeal against sentence was granted but the sentence appeal was also dismissed as there was no error of principle and sentences imposed were within range.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant/defendant: TAB
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 July 2002
Procedural Posture
Conviction and Sentence Appeal / Judgment in Court of Criminal Appeal
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted, appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sexual Assault, Relationship Evidence, Complaint Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Jury Directions, Evidence of Prior Good Character, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Sexual Assault Relationship Evidence Complaint Evidence Admissibility of Evidence Jury Directions Evidence of Prior Good Character Appeal Against Conviction +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 29 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

TAB

Appellant/defendant

Procedural Posture

Conviction and Sentence Appeal / Judgment in Court of Criminal Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether relationship evidence and complaint evidence were properly admitted and directed to the jury
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in his rulings on character evidence
  3. 3 Whether there was a miscarriage of justice in the handling of evidentiary and jury directions issues

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal against conviction was dismissed because the trial judge correctly admitted and directed the jury on relationship and complaint evidence, any misstatements in directions were appropriately corrected, there was no miscarriage of justice regarding character evidence because evidence sought was not available and no miscarriage arose from its exclusion, and there was no substantive error in admitting or directing on other evidence. Leave to appeal against sentence was granted but the sentence appeal was also dismissed as there was no error of principle and sentences imposed were within range.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted, appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction dismissed.
  • Leave to appeal against sentence is granted.