R v Rolfe [2017] NSWDC 186
The offending warranted imprisonment because count 1 was just below the middle of the range of objective seriousness, count 2 was in the middle of the range, the Form 1 matters added to the criminality, general and specific deterrence were important, aggravating factors were established, and partial accumulation was required to reflect totality. A 15% discount was allowed for the guilty plea, special circumstances justified varying the statutory ratio, and the offender's prospects of rehabilitation were assessed as moderate rather than good.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Sentenced to a total effective sentence of 5 years and 3 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years and 2 months and a balance of term of 2 years and 1 month. Bonds revoked for each call up offence and a sentence of 1 month imprisonment imposed for each.
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Intercourse With Child 10 14 Years' 'procure Child for Unlawful Sexual Activity' 'aggravated Indecent Assault Form 1 Offences' 'breach of Section 9 Bonds' 'objective Seriousness' 'special Circumstances' 'totality']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for sexual intercourse with a child above the age of 10 years and under the age of 14 years and procuring a child under 16 years for unlawful sexual activity.' 'How the Form 1 aggravated indecent assault offences should be taken into account.' 'Whether objective seriousness, aggravating factors, subjective circumstances, prospects of rehabilitation, remorse, special circumstances and totality affected sentence.' "How to deal with the offender's breaches of four section 9 bonds."]
Ratio Decidendi
The offending warranted imprisonment because count 1 was just below the middle of the range of objective seriousness, count 2 was in the middle of the range, the Form 1 matters added to the criminality, general and specific deterrence were important, aggravating factors were established, and partial accumulation was required to reflect totality. A 15% discount was allowed for the guilty plea, special circumstances justified varying the statutory ratio, and the offender's prospects of rehabilitation were assessed as moderate rather than good.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to a total effective sentence of 5 years and 3 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years and 2 months and a balance of term of 2 years and 1 month. Bonds revoked for each call up offence and a sentence of 1 month imprisonment imposed for each.
Orders
- ['In relation to each offence the offender is convicted.' 'For count 2, procuring a child under 16 years for unlawful sexual activity and taking into account the Form 1 offence of aggravated indecent assault, the offender is sentenced to a non-parole period of 1 year and 6 months from 24 February 2016 to 23 August...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment