R v Tatola (No. 3) [2023] NSWDC 388
Section 61I of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), read in its statutory context and against the ordinary implication of mens rea in criminal offences, does not exclude voluntariness or intention as an element of the offence. The provisions concerning knowledge of lack of consent, recklessness, sexual acts, sexual activity and aggravated sexual assault in company indicate that the offence contemplates a guilty state of mind and does not capture accidental sexual intercourse. Therefore intention is a necessary element of the offence charged in the indictment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Whether the Act of Sexual Intercourse Under S 61 I of the Crimes Act 1900 (nsw) Must Be an Intentional Act
- Outcome
- The Court determined that intention is a necessary element of the offence charged in the indictment.
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'mens Rea' 'intentional Act' 'voluntariness' 'absolute Offence' 'crimes Act 1900 (nsw) S 61 I']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Whether the Act of Sexual Intercourse Under S 61 I of the Crimes Act 1900 (nsw) Must Be an Intentional Act
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the act of sexual intercourse described in s 61I of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) must be an intentional act.' 'Whether s 61I of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) creates an absolute offence containing all elements in the words of the section.' 'Whether the statutory scheme excludes voluntariness or intention as an element of the offending.']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 61I of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), read in its statutory context and against the ordinary implication of mens rea in criminal offences, does not exclude voluntariness or intention as an element of the offence. The provisions concerning knowledge of lack of consent, recklessness, sexual acts, sexual activity and aggravated sexual assault in company indicate that the offence contemplates a guilty state of mind and does not capture accidental sexual intercourse. Therefore intention is a necessary element of the offence charged in the indictment.
Court Disposition
The Court determined that intention is a necessary element of the offence charged in the indictment.
Orders
- ['Intention is a necessary element of the offence, being the charge in the indictment.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment