R v Junior [2020] NSWDC 568
The offending was a single escalating course of opportunistic and predatory sexual conduct against a vulnerable victim, with the offender reckless as to consent. Counts 1 and 3 were in the upper part of the low range and Count 2 in the middle-low range. Imprisonment was the only appropriate penalty, with an aggregate sentence required by totality. The offender's immigration detention was not custody in relation to the offences for s 47(3) because it also resulted from his unlawful status and dealings with the Department, but its factual connection with the pending proceedings and high security character constituted a special circumstance warranting a substantial reduction of the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Sentence / Sentencing After Trial and Conviction on 3 Counts of Sexual Intercourse Without Consent
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted on Counts 1, 2 and 3 and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years and 3 months with a non-parole period expiring on 8 August 2021.
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'digital Penetration' 'objective Seriousness' 'special Circumstances' 'immigration Detention' 'non Parole Period' 'totality' 'recklessness as to Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Sentence / Sentencing After Trial and Conviction on 3 Counts of Sexual Intercourse Without Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What facts should be found consistently with the jury verdicts for sentence, including the offender's knowledge that the victim was not consenting." 'The objective seriousness of each count of sexual intercourse without consent.' "Whether the offender's immigration detention should be treated as custody in relation to the offences for backdating or as a special circumstance affecting the non-parole period." 'The appropriate aggregate sentence and non-parole period having regard to totality, rehabilitation, deterrence, remorse and special circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offending was a single escalating course of opportunistic and predatory sexual conduct against a vulnerable victim, with the offender reckless as to consent. Counts 1 and 3 were in the upper part of the low range and Count 2 in the middle-low range. Imprisonment was the only appropriate penalty, with an aggregate sentence required by totality. The offender's immigration detention was not custody in relation to the offences for s 47(3) because it also resulted from his unlawful status and dealings with the Department, but its factual connection with the pending proceedings and high security character constituted a special circumstance warranting a substantial reduction of the...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted on Counts 1, 2 and 3 and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 3 years and 3 months with a non-parole period expiring on 8 August 2021.
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted on Counts 1, 2 and 3.' 'The offender, Usman Junior, is sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 3 years and 3 months commencing on 9 February 2020 and expiring on 8 May 2023.' 'The non-parole period is to expire on 8 August 2021 and the balance term is to expire on 8 May 2023.' 'I direct...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment