R v Cannon [2020] NSWDC 327
The combination of factors advanced by the accused do not constitute special reasons in the interests of justice under s 291 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 which would justify permitting his de facto spouse to be present during the presentation of the complainant’s evidence. The legislative purpose of minimising embarrassment and protecting privacy applies regardless of the complainant’s presence, and the circumstances are not out of the ordinary to warrant departure from the requirement for in camera proceedings.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application During Trial
- Outcome
- Application Refused
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Offence Proceedings' 'in Camera Hearings' 'special Reasons for Open Court']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the accused's de facto spouse should be permitted to remain in court during the presentation of the complainant's evidence"]
Ratio Decidendi
The combination of factors advanced by the accused do not constitute special reasons in the interests of justice under s 291 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 which would justify permitting his de facto spouse to be present during the presentation of the complainant’s evidence. The legislative purpose of minimising embarrassment and protecting privacy applies regardless of the complainant’s presence, and the circumstances are not out of the ordinary to warrant departure from the requirement for in camera proceedings.
Court Disposition
Application Refused
Orders
- ["The application for the accused's de facto spouse to be present in court during the presentation of the complainant's evidence is refused"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment