R v Pender [2022] NSWDC 160
The appropriate aggregate sentence for two counts of sexual intercourse without consent was six years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years and six months, considering the objective seriousness, victim impact, absence of certain aggravating features, mitigation due to the offender's background of trauma and disadvantage, and partial utilitarian benefit for efficient conduct of the trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Trial
- Outcome
- Offender convicted and sentenced to aggregate term of imprisonment.
- Legal Topics
- ['sexual Offences' 'sentencing' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'victim Impact' 'childhood Trauma']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for sexual intercourse without consent' "Relevance of offender's background and trauma to sentencing" 'Application of standard non-parole period and special circumstances' 'Objective seriousness of the offences committed' 'Impact of utilitarian benefit from trial conduct']
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate aggregate sentence for two counts of sexual intercourse without consent was six years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of three years and six months, considering the objective seriousness, victim impact, absence of certain aggravating features, mitigation due to the offender's background of trauma and disadvantage, and partial utilitarian benefit for efficient conduct of the trial.
Court Disposition
Offender convicted and sentenced to aggregate term of imprisonment.
Orders
- ["Aggregate sentence of six years' imprisonment commencing 14 October 2020." 'Non-parole period of three years and six months.' 'Eligible for parole on 13 April 2024.' 'Sentence expires 13 October 2026.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment