LIONEL FRANCIS SEYMOUR THOMPSON V. PIONEER OMNIBUS COMPANY LIMITED

LIONEL FRANCIS SEYMOUR THOMPSON V. PIONEER OMNIBUS COMPANY LIMITED

Plaintiff, having actively participated in and voted for the resolutions authorising the share allotment, is estopped from challenging that allotment. As there was no change in facts nor fraud established, plaintiff's acquiescence bars relief.

Parties
Plaintiff (appellant): Lionel Francois Seymour Thompson; Defendant (respondent): Pioneer Omnibus Company Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 September 1948
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Share Allotment, Corporate Procedure, Directors' Duties, Estoppel
Company Law Share Allotment Corporate Procedure Directors' Duties Estoppel

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lionel Francois Seymour Thompson

Plaintiff (appellant)

Pioneer Omnibus Company Limited

Defendant (respondent)

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendant from allotting shares pursuant to a directors' resolution.
  2. 2 Whether the action fails due to improper constitution of parties.
  3. 3 Whether plaintiff, having acquiesced and actively participated in the resolutions, can challenge validity of the share issue.

Ratio Decidendi

Plaintiff, having actively participated in and voted for the resolutions authorising the share allotment, is estopped from challenging that allotment. As there was no change in facts nor fraud established, plaintiff's acquiescence bars relief.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.