Bruce v Knight (No 3) [2021] NSWCATAP 343
The appeal panel's decision to award the Appellants' costs at first instance was a deliberate exercise of discretion and not an obvious error, clerical mistake, or accidental omission. Therefore, the slip rule power under s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) cannot be used to amend or remove the costs order. The application by the Respondents to amend the orders is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application to Amend Costs Orders Under Slip Rule
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['slip Rule' 'application to Amend Orders' 'costs' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application to Amend Costs Orders Under Slip Rule
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Appeal Panel has power under s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) to amend its earlier costs order due to an alleged error' 'Whether the error identified is within the scope of the slip rule power' 'Whether procedural fairness was denied to the Respondents in the making of the costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal panel's decision to award the Appellants' costs at first instance was a deliberate exercise of discretion and not an obvious error, clerical mistake, or accidental omission. Therefore, the slip rule power under s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) cannot be used to amend or remove the costs order. The application by the Respondents to amend the orders is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ["The Respondents' application to amend the orders of 31 August 2021 pursuant to s 63 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) is dismissed." "The stay of order (3) of the Appeal Panel's orders of 31 August 2021 is lifted." 'If the Appellants seek costs, they must file submissions limited to three...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment